The main difference is that in order to agree, a person must say something that another person agrees with. But to agree, it is enough to adopt the same point of view. When people talk about agreeing with someone or something, they can choose to say the word “consent” to describe it. However, it should be noted that “consent” does not correspond to word processors. How is it that a word so often heard and used is not accepted by these grammatical tools? Well, in simple terms, that`s because terms like “consent” aren`t really appropriate words. (This only counts as consent if John and Sam don`t know each other) “They had agreed that they would not interfere in each other`s affairs” I don`t think “agreement” is a generally accepted word. That`s not to say it isn`t used in some circles or regions, but I don`t remember ever hearing or reading it, and it seems strange to me. I would never use it myself. When you say “people from my region,” are you talking about a particular geographic area, profession or discipline? I am curious about this group that uses the word. Would you say that “agreement” is just an old-fashioned term that has now disappeared over time, and we should just use “agreement” so that everyone knows what we are talking about? As a security measure, I will continue to use the term “agreement.” “Agreement between experimental observations and theory” Some say that “agreement” means the same as “agreement”. Others say there is a subtle difference between the two. The agreement is when two parties share a point of view. Agreement is when one party says something that another agrees with.
a negotiated and generally legally binding agreement between the parties on a course of action “The results of my experiment are consistent with Michelson`s and the law of general relativity.” “There was no agreement between theory and measure” An agreement is an understanding, a compromise to get both sides to find common ground. For things to coincide, they are harmonious or do not contradict each other. One of the strangest abstract names that has emerged recently is the word consent, because it is “I agree with this position.” A name is a person, a place or a thing. An abstract name is a concept. You can`t see, touch, smell, taste, or hear a chord the same way we see a truck, hear a sound, taste a sandwich, or smell smoke. English has several ways of forming abstract nouns. The ending —ance is one of those endings with —ion and —ment. To anticipate an objection, yes, I am aware that consent is an old English word that dates back to at least the 16th century. However, I also suspect that his rise is not due to a renewed appreciation of an old word, although rarely used. For example, if I think chocolate is the best type of ice cream and someone who lives 5000 miles away has the same point of view, we would agree.
It doesn`t matter if we never meet or communicate with each other. When you agree with someone, you accept what they tell you to be true. Over time, the word “consent” fell out of favor and was replaced by “agreement.” If you agree with me, I will make these changes. It is a very effective contribution and I fully agree with it. We were almost done with “consent” and then a fucking redneck had to merge “approval” with “acceptance” and we`re back where we started. *facepalm* Using the chord for the chord is arguably the linguistic equivalent of using a crescent wrench instead of a combo key or socket wrench. You can do it, but it always leaves a little damage. If you want to use consent, fine, it doesn`t matter, but at least know that the old robust agreement is in the toolbox.
Remember, the next time you discuss your “consent” with something, the word you`re looking for is “consent” – a subtle but significant difference. According to these people, there is agreement when two parties share a point of view. consent status; harmony of opinion, statement, action or character; compliance; Harmony; compliance; Because there is a good agreement between the members of the Council […].